Recently, a remarkable discovery has emerged in the Crypto Assets community. A user compared the Airdrop query websites of the Camp Network and Somnia Network projects, and the results were surprising.

The two seemingly independent projects have remarkably similar airdrop query websites. Aside from differences in color schemes and branding, nearly all other aspects of the websites are almost identical. This finding has raised questions among community members about the design innovation of the airdrop query websites.

There is a view that, in the current market environment, Airdrop query websites do not seem to require much innovation. Project parties may prefer to use proven effective design templates rather than invest resources in developing entirely new interfaces.

This approach, while having advantages in efficiency, has also sparked discussions about the uniqueness and innovative spirit of the project. Some community members believe that this highly similar design may affect users' trust in the project and their assessment of its professionalism.

However, there are also voices pointing out that the similar website design of the two projects may be due to practicality considerations, or because they may have used the services of the same outsourcing team. This practice is not uncommon in the rapidly evolving blockchain industry, especially for emerging projects with limited resources.

Regardless, this discovery brings an interesting discussion topic to the Crypto Assets community. It not only involves the uniqueness and innovation of the project but also touches on broader issues, such as how to balance efficiency and originality in a competitive market.

As airdrop activities become increasingly popular in the world of crypto assets, how projects can showcase their unique features while maintaining efficiency will become a noteworthy issue.